|
A Brief Summary of the Proceedings
of IMExcellence's
Clearing, Settlement & Custody Conference
Held on February 24 and 25, 2003, in Frankfurt am Main
The Conference Chairman,
Dr. Hans-Günther Nordhues of Ashurst Morris
Crisp welcomed those in attendance and introduced the first group
of speakers, who addressed new developments in European clearing,
settlement and custody.
The first speaker was Mr.
David Richards, Director of Product Design, Clearstream
Banking. Mr. Richards gave us a detailed presentation of changes
in the German domestic settlement environment and current developments
in collateral management. The present model offers finality in two
batches during daytime processing, with finality meaning the completion
of securities transactions on both the cash and securities side.
Clearstream Banking Frankfurt (CBF) has worked to improve this model
following the recommendations of its Market Rules Committee, the
Deutsche Bundesbank, and the European Central Bank (ECB). The new
settlement model and cash clearing allow finality in an additional,
third batch during nighttime processing on the basis of a reservation
of liquidity by the Bundesbank, with booking or debit of accounts
taking place around the opening of TARGET. Bund custody payments
would not be netted against settlement net funding requirement,
but would be included in each customer's payout at about 7:00 am.
Mr. Richards also outlined how Xemac could provide collateral to
the Bundesbank, Eurex or in the context of securities lending transactions,
and how international customers can use the continuous link available
through Clearstream Bank Luxembourg to access CBF's RTS cycle.
Mr. Scott Riley,
Sales Director, Euronext and Clearnet SBFSA then discussed the benefits
of Clearnet's central counterparty and its benefits for the market.
Mr. Riley began by outlining the recommendations presented in the
Group of 30's recent report, "Global Clearing and Settlement:
A Plan of Action" with regard to creating an interoperable
global network, mitigating risk and improving governance. The Clearnet
CCP has been developed to allow an increasing amount of interoperability
among various jurisdictions by providing a settlement network capable
of international access, and its contractual alliances will further
this process. Mr. Riley then reiterated how the novation of obligations
into a CCP established on a sound legal basis with precision risk
management and good governance works to mitigate risk, thus further
addressing the recommendations of the Group of 30.
Mr. Gerald Noltsch,
Head of Frankfurt Branch, BNP Paribas Securities Services made the
case for agent banks' interests in the development of a European
system for clearing and settlement. Agent banks are concerned about
ICSDs engaging both in agent banking services and acting as the
ultimate custodian and settling agent of securities transactions
on a given market. Mr. Noltsch explained that this would create
an uneven playing field by allowing the ICSD to cross subsidize
its "agent bank" unit with the returns of its settlement
unit. Mr. Noltsch explained that BNP Paribas supports a "DTCC"
utility-type model for Europe, in which the utility-like settlement
agent would not compete with its own customers. Mr. Noltsch also
illustrated how CBF's new settlement model will reduce settlement
risk.
Following a break for lunch,
Mr. Claus Hilles, Deputy Chairman, Euro Banking
Association (EBA), explained the EBA's Step2 project to create a
pan-European system for interbank payments with direct participation
open to any financial institution in the European Union. This system
would build on the Euro1, Step1 system that has been in operation
since January 1999. Step2 would allow any EU bank to engage an EBA
participant bank for the transfer of payments to the EBA system,
thereby greatly increasing the scope of the EBA network through
which payments could be made. Another new service would be the ability
to send files containing a number of payment instructions to the
Step2 system, which would allow banks to make more payments with
less administrative effort and cost.
Ms. Bernie Kennedy,
Project Manager for CLS Services then explained the operation and
benefits of the CLS system, pointing out how CLS addresses settlement,
liquidity, market, credit and operational risks. Ms. Kennedy argued
that CLS will become the standard for all FX transactions in light
of the existing proportion of custody third party FXs and the many
advantages of FX settlement post-CLS. Ms. Kennedy also explained
the impact of the CLS Custody Working Group on third party identifier
codes and CLS mapping with respect to custodians.
Ms. Kennedy, togther with Messrs
Richards, Riley, Noltsch and Hilles where then joined by Mr.
Roland Neuschwander, Direktor, Deutsche Bundesbank, and
sat as a panel chaired by Mr. Nordhues. The panel discussed further
transaction services that may be offered by in the processing field,
as well as the role that the regulator may play in providing support
and achieving fairness. With respect to the law on which the various
international systems are based, the panel was of the opinion that
no single country offered a clearly superior legal framework for
clearing and settlement.
Two very interesting presentations
followed the panel discussion. First, Mr. Andreas Mall,
Treasury Information Manager for FSTO Shell Finance Services Shell
Centre discussed the expectations of a corporate customer with respect
to its banks that perform settlement and related services. Mr. Mall
outlined the vast financial network of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group,
which is active in 135 countries and must account for payments to
and from some 40,000 service stations. Mr. Mall explained Shell's
primary bank project, which – through its design of architecture,
processing and communication – seeks to streamline the concern's
worldwide financial relationships. One interesting detail is Shell's
move to use internet communication globally after certain proprietary
lines were temporarily disabled on September 11, 2001, when recourse
to the internet proved a successful alternative.
The day was topped of with a
valuable presentation by Dr. Martin Bösch,
Managing Director of Financial Markets Service Bank, who argued
that the use of specialized transaction banks facilitated attainment
of efficiency and cost reduction through economies of scale. Mr.
Bösch explained that not all increases in scale lead to like
increases in efficiency and reductions in costs, but rather increases
in scale with respect to like tasks from the same clients –
such as through the concentration of certain services in transaction
banks – can maximize such increases. In concluding, Mr. Bösch
clarified that the opinion that there are "too many players
in the market" is overly simplistic, given that competition
of many players leads to an efficient allocation of tasks and resources
and the creation of solutions based on a number of available economic
models.
A very pleasant cocktail reception concluded
the day's activities.
Day two of the conference began
with Chairman Nordhues introducing Ms. Corinna Linner,
General Manager of State Street Bank, Munich, who explained how
the global custodian services offered by State Street Bank are well
tailored to meet the problems facing the current European market.
Echoing the concerns expressed in the European Commission's Giovannini
Report, Ms. Linner explained that the European market for clearing
and settlement is plagued by a lack of interoperability arising
from inconsistent data formats and reporting systems, a lack of
centralized operations and communication between market participants,
and – as a result – a higher degree of settlement risk.
Ms. Linner illustrated how the consolidated management, reporting,
custody and settlement systems present in the State Street Bank
global network point the way to a more efficient market in Europe.
Next, Mr. Ronny Vogt,
Deputy Chief Executive Officer, SIS SegaInterSettle presented the
impressive capabilities of SIS for realtime settlement and also
outlined a project – supported by Switzerland, Portugal and
Italy – for a globally operative Central Securities Settlement
Infrastructure (CSSI). This somewhat futuristic structure would
attempt to sidestep the problems arising from conflicting legal
systems by isolating the minimal number of processes necessary for
settlement, and placing them in a CSSI facility. This would reduce
the applicable number of applicable legal principles and eliminate
a great deal of conflict. The CSSI project provoked a lively debate
among both the hopeful and the critical members of the audience
– showing just how desirable such a system is, but also how
far out of reach its realization remains.
Mr. Karsten Schröder,
of Euroclear Bank then explained Euroclear's two-pronged strategy
for correcting fragmentation in the European market: the consolidation
of settlement through use of book-entry transfers and the simultaneous
harmonization of rules and usage across markets. The Euroclear business
model would allow customers to operate a single, operational account
for their entire business. Securities for which an agent bank or
the Euroclear Group is the domestic CSD, would be eligible for a
"domestic" package under local law. Securities eligible
for inclusion in Euroclear Bank would receive a "full service"
package under Belgian law. Mr. Schröder explained that Euroclear
seeks to optimize services for its users rather than maximize profits,
and that it does not cross-subsidize between its domestic and full
service packages. Mr. Schröder also responded to a number of
questions regarding the transparency of ICSD pricing.
Mr. Mark Kirby,
Head of International Policy, CRESTCo, then offered some very useful
suggestions on how to approach the need to harmonize the European
market for clearing and settlement services. Mr. Kirby demarcated
what he believes to be the range of an (I)CSD's influence in this
project. He explained that although the (I)CSDs cannot enact tax
reform, harmonize legal principles of ownership or impose a single
language on Europe, they can work on harmonizing system functionality
by leading the debate on market practice and lobbying for legal
and tax reform. Mr. Kirby stressed that no participant in this project
should assume that its own market practices are the best ones, but
should remain open to change. He also pointed out that although
the processes used by (I)CSDs may vary, the functionality of a given
action may be quite similar, such as freezing assets and allowing
conditioned unwind in the case of pledges and takeover acceptances,
and in some areas, such as collateral management, the products are
quite uniform across Europe: securities loans, repos and pledges.
Dr.Wolfgang Mansfeld,
President, European Investment Fund Association FEFSI shared his
insights on the expectations of funds from the providers of fund
processing and custody. He explained that there is an "urgency
for action" in the reform of the infrastructure and operations
of investment management processes and fund order processing. The
costs borne by fund companies amount to 10 basis points on fund
assets, with an earnings margin of 50 basis points. Fund order processing
is impeded by varying business practices, differing communication
standards protocols and a failure to exploit potential scale effects.
Dr. Mansfeld offered an outline for a "connectivity manager"
as a possible, market neutral solution to these problems.
The final speaker of the day,
Mr. Dietmar Rössler, Business Manager European
Investor Services, BNP Paribas Securities Services, provided his
insight on the role of global custodians and the challenges they
face with respect to fund management and fund distribution. Mr.
Rössler explained that fund distribution requires order capture
tools, STP execution and settlement of fund orders with monitoring
and reporting of the order status, custody or registration services,
calculation and reporting of trailer fees and funds reference databases.
He further distinguished between the needs of retail distributors
and those of institutional clients. Mr. Rössler also illustrated
the important role of global custodians in meeting market challenges,
noting that global custodians do not restrict their focus to either
off-shore or local markets, but cover all the markets. Global custodians
also integrate custody services with funds products and are in a
position to calculate and manage trailer fees for both promoters
and distributors of funds. In addition, they are in a position to
offer a complete, integrated and fully automated service to both
retail and institutional investors.
On the legal side of the challenges
facing clearing and settlement, Chairman Nordhues remarked in closing
that the project of dematerializing securities – albeit announced
decades ago – has not made encouraging progress, and deserved
continued attention.
|
|